A multibillion-dollar agreement that will give the tribe control over sports betting across the state has been confirmed.In June, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned a federal judge's November 2021 ruling blocking the gambling agreement.
Owners of Magic City Casino in Miami-Dade County and Bonita Springs Poker Room in Southwest Florida, who challenged a sports gambling plan, asked the Court of Appeals for a second hearing known as a ``en banc'' hearing. He asked for a hearing. But the court rejected the application on Monday without providing detailed reasons. 스보벳 무료쿠폰
Governor. Ron DeSantis and Seminole Tribe of Florida Chairman Marcellus Osceola in 2021 signed a 30-year gambling deal that included giving the tribe control of sports betting. After the deal was ratified by the Legislature, the Magic City and Bonita Springs pari-mutuel owners filed a lawsuit alleging the sports-betting plan violated federal law and would cause a “significant and potentially devastating impact” on their operations. 해외토토사이트 추천
The deal included a “hub-and-spoke” sports-betting plan designed to allow gamblers anywhere in the state to place bets online, with the bets run through computer servers on tribal property. The deal, known as a compact, said bets “using a mobile app or other electronic device, shall be deemed to be exclusively conducted by the tribe.” 아시안커넥트 회원가입
In November 2021, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich ruled that the plan ran afoul of the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which regulates gambling on tribal lands, because the deal would allow gambling off property owned by the Seminoles.
Friedrich, calling the setup a “fiction,” also invalidated other parts of the compact, finding that U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland was wrong when she allowed the deal to go into effect. The Department of the Interior, which oversees tribal gaming, appealed the decision.
A unanimous decision of a three-judge panel in June stated that Washington, D.C. The settlement judge erred in finding that the agreement violated a federal law known as IGRA because it allowed gambling "on and off" Indian lands.
The impact of Monday's ruling on sports betting in Florida is not immediately clear.
The Seminoles temporarily launched the Hard Rock Sportsbook mobile app in response to the lawsuit, but stopped accepting bets and deposits through the app in December 2021 following Friedrich's decision.
Seminole Tribe spokesman Gary Bitner said Tuesday that the Seminole Tribe is "pleased" with the Court of Appeals' decision not to grant en banc proceedings. However, the Seminoles did not comment on whether they plan to accept betting through the app again.
Additionally, it was not clear whether pari-mutuels would ask the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the issue.
The treaty not only gave the Seminole tribe control over online sports betting, but also allowed the tribe to offer craps and roulette in its casinos. The agreement also allows the Seminole Tribe to build three casinos on tribal land in Broward County.
In return, the tribes promised to pay the state at least $2.5 billion over the first five years and billions more over the compact's 30-year lifespan. The agreement adds Florida to a number of states that have switched to sports betting following a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that paved the way for sports betting in New Jersey.
Daniel Wallach, an attorney specializing in gambling law, said the Florida Compact decision "checks at least three boxes that suggest Supreme Court review." The decision is "inconsistent" with decisions of other federal appeals courts, "perhaps inconsistent with the Supreme Court's own precedent," and "an important question of federal law that has not yet been resolved but should be resolved." Contains. supreme court.
The decision in the Florida case contradicts at least eight federal appeals court decisions in other circuit courts that have declared that the Indian Gaming Control Act "does not apply to off-reservation tribal gaming activities," Wallach said. he told News Service Florida on Tuesday.
``This is clearly an important issue of federal law because it affects the relationship between tribes and state and local governments across the country. "It would impact non-tribal gambling operators as well because it would dramatically change the landscape," he said.
The court needs to resolve this issue "sooner rather than later," Wallach added.
``Thus, rather than addressing this issue now and resolving the issue, the Supreme Court is desperately in need of the controversial question of whether the scope of IGRA extends to regulated gambling activities in tribes outside of Indian territory. "We will continue to be mired in a maze of contradictory and contradictory federal court rulings," he said.
Some critics of the deal argue that the sports betting agreement does not comply with a 2018 constitutional amendment that requires statewide voter approval to expand gambling in Florida. According to the so-called Third Amendment, gambling expansion must be put to a nationwide vote as part of a people-led process.
